FLGB vs. FSZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) and FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - FLGB tracks the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index while FSZ tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGB returned 12.14%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for FSZ. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FLGB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FSZ.

Performance

FLGB vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 4.14% return.

FLGB

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 5.44%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.47%

FSZ

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.37%
• 6M: 0.72%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 1Y: 10.51%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 9.88%
• ALL TIME*: 9.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	$6.13M	$3.79M	$3.38M
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	$60.67K	$60.90K	$87.60K

FLGB vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	11.41%	33.73%	8.77%	14.33%	-6.00%	17.14%	-9.47%	23.23%	-11.60%	1.12%
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	4.14%	30.10%	-1.85%	21.30%	-20.12%	20.18%	13.83%	25.88%	-15.22%	1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and FSZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.67

The correlation between FLGB and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGB vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLGB	FSZ
Financial Services	25.5%	18.8%
Consumer Defensive	14.4%	6.3%
Industrials	14.4%	22.2%
Healthcare	13.8%	23.1%
Energy	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	8.2%	8.0%
Utilities	5.0%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	11.0%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.9%	3.2%
Technology	0.6%	1.4%

Return for Risk

FLGB vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLGB

FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FSZ

FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLGB vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLGB	FSZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	0.73	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.17	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.13	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	1.02	+1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	2.70	+5.38

FLGB vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and FSZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLGB	FSZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-33.97%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-10.39%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.13%	-13.93%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	-33.96%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-3.16%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-6.96%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.90%	-0.85%

Volatility

FLGB vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) is 3.96%, while First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FLGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLGB	FSZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	4.82%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	11.54%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	14.50%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	19.43%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	18.71%	+0.19%

FLGB vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLGB vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than FSZ's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	2.85%	3.50%	4.42%	3.95%	4.23%	2.93%	2.67%	4.30%	3.92%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	2.00%	1.80%	1.80%	2.11%	3.50%	1.62%	1.53%	2.01%	2.29%	1.49%	1.93%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLGB and FSZ in my portfolio?

FLGB and FSZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLGB or FSZ?

FSZ has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FLGB (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

Which ETF is better, FLGB or FSZ?

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 12.14% vs 5.68% for FSZ. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLGB or FSZ?

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLGB or FSZ?

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLGB or FSZ?

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.00% for FSZ.

What is the main difference between FLGB and FSZ?

FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.80% for FSZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.