PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGB vs. FLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGB vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.97% return.


FLGB

1D
-1.10%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
4.93%
6M
8.94%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*

FLIN

1D
-1.39%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-11.97%
6M
-11.76%
1Y
-12.00%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGB vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.93%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-10.75%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
-11.97%2.40%10.33%20.58%-7.96%24.96%14.50%4.77%-6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and FLIN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.49

The correlation between FLGB and FLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGB vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGB
FLIN

Financial Services

24.2%
27.2%

Industrials

14.2%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
5.8%

Healthcare

13.6%
6.5%

Energy

11.8%
9.5%

Basic Materials

8.6%
9.2%

Utilities

5.3%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
12.0%

Communication Services

2.6%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.3%

Technology

0.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

FLGB
24.2%
FLIN
27.2%

Industrials

FLGB
14.2%
FLIN
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLGB
14.0%
FLIN
5.8%

Healthcare

FLGB
13.6%
FLIN
6.5%

Energy

FLGB
11.8%
FLIN
9.5%

Basic Materials

FLGB
8.6%
FLIN
9.2%

Utilities

FLGB
5.3%
FLIN
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGB
4.4%
FLIN
12.0%

Communication Services

FLGB
2.6%
FLIN
4.6%

Real Estate

FLGB
0.7%
FLIN
1.3%

Technology

FLGB
0.7%
FLIN
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGB vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIN
FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGB vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGBFLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.88

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

-0.64

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

-1.57

+8.30

FLGB vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGBFLINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

-0.80

+2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.26

+0.15

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and FLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGBFLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-41.90%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-18.79%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.13%

-22.85%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-22.85%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-18.96%

+14.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-8.02%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

7.67%

-4.86%

Volatility

FLGB vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGBFLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.07%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

12.92%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

15.02%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.75%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

20.45%

-1.48%

FLGB vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGB vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.33%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
0.64%0.56%1.58%0.73%0.73%2.26%0.68%0.90%0.92%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGB and FLIN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to FLIN (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.55% vs 3.54% for FLIN. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.

FLGB is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.19% for FLIN.

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGB and FLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer