FLGB vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLGB returned 18.89% vs -40.97% for EZBC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLGB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

FLGB vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -31.15% return.

FLGB

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 18.89%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -5.09%
• 1M: -26.01%
• YTD: -31.15%
• 6M: -32.61%
• 1Y: -40.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGB vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	4.93%	33.73%	10.20%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-31.15%	-6.56%	100.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and EZBC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.28

Return for Risk

FLGB vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGB

FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 40
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGB vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLGB	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	-0.94	+2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	-1.33	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.85	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	-0.79	+2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.73	-1.42	+8.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLGB vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLGB	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	-0.94	+2.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.22	+0.19

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLGB	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-52.07%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-52.07%	+41.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.88%	-52.07%	+47.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-16.13%	+9.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	28.78%	-25.97%

Volatility

FLGB vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) is 5.31%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that FLGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLGB	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	9.87%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.14%	34.18%	-22.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.25%	43.97%	-29.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	50.12%	-33.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	50.12%	-31.15%

FLGB vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLGB vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	3.33%	3.50%	4.42%	3.95%	4.23%	2.93%	2.67%	4.30%	3.92%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLGB and EZBC in my portfolio?

FLGB and EZBC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLGB or EZBC?

EZBC has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to FLGB (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs EZBC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, FLGB or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, FLGB leads with 18.89% vs -40.97% for EZBC. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLGB or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 18.89% return vs -40.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLGB or EZBC?

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLGB or EZBC?

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between FLGB and EZBC?

FLGB is categorized as Europe Equities, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.