FLEU vs. EWP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FLEU tracks the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net while EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEU returned 11.75%/yr vs 18.75%/yr for EWP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLEU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWP.

Performance

FLEU vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 11.25% return.

FLEU

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 7.40%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: —

EWP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 41.28%
• 3Y*: 33.03%
• 5Y*: 18.75%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEU vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	7.40%	41.56%	2.26%	16.21%	-9.14%	23.27%	0.95%	26.94%	-8.54%	-1.24%
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	11.25%	78.03%	5.70%	30.26%	-5.18%	0.25%	-3.94%	11.93%	-15.32%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and EWP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.70

The correlation between FLEU and EWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLEU vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLEU	EWP
Financial Services	24.6%	42.4%
Industrials	20.7%	16.3%
Technology	16.3%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	4.6%
Utilities	6.6%	21.4%
Healthcare	5.6%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Energy	3.7%	4.1%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.8%

Return for Risk

FLEU vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEU

FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 34
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 37

EWP

EWP Risk / Return Rank: 71
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEU vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLEU	EWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.21	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.94	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.38	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	3.64	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	12.92	-7.35

FLEU vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and EWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLEU	EWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-61.19%	+27.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-11.38%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.67%	-12.19%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.67%	-31.63%	+12.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-0.72%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-21.40%	+16.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	3.20%	+0.49%

Volatility

FLEU vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLEU	EWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	5.49%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.05%	16.07%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	18.81%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	20.29%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.27%	21.56%	-3.29%

FLEU vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLEU vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than EWP's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	2.82%	2.27%	4.35%	2.70%	3.07%	3.29%	2.56%	3.72%	3.69%	2.72%	4.65%	3.85%
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	1.08%	2.22%	3.18%	3.25%	21.45%	3.03%	1.94%	6.06%	12.17%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLEU and EWP in my portfolio?

FLEU and EWP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLEU or EWP?

EWP has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FLEU (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs EWP's -61.19%.

Which ETF is better, FLEU or EWP?

On 5-year performance, EWP leads with 18.75% vs 11.75% for FLEU. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLEU or EWP?

Over the 5-year period, EWP has performed better with a 18.75% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLEU or EWP?

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLEU or EWP?

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.08% for FLEU.

What is the main difference between FLEU and EWP?

FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEU and 0.50% for EWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.