FLEU vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLEU returned 12.08%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for BIAHX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLEU charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 1.18% return.

FLEU

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 10.70%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: —

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 3.78%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: 11.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	7.22%	41.56%	2.26%	16.21%	-9.14%	23.27%	0.95%	26.94%	-8.54%	-1.24%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	1.18%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and BIAHX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.75

The correlation between FLEU and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLEU vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEU

FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 32
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLEU	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.90	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.37	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.17	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	0.96	+0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.48	2.99	+2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLEU	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.90	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.74	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.58	-0.01

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, roughly equal to the maximum BIAHX drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLEU	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-34.90%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-13.18%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.67%	-13.18%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.67%	-30.95%	+12.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-6.61%	+5.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-6.03%	+1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	4.21%	-0.53%

Volatility

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.89%. This indicates that FLEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLEU	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	4.89%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	11.51%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	13.95%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	16.36%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.26%	17.29%	+0.97%

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLEU vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than BIAHX's 7.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.51%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF	2.07%	2.22%	3.18%	3.25%	21.45%	3.03%	1.94%	6.06%	12.17%	0.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLEU and BIAHX in my portfolio?

FLEU and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLEU or BIAHX?

FLEU has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to BIAHX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.