FLEH vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLEH is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLEH returned 18.35% vs -38.68% for EZBC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLEH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

FLEH vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -25.36% return.

FLEH

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 18.35%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -18.42%
• YTD: -25.36%
• 6M: -29.82%
• 1Y: -38.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEH vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF	6.27%	41.56%	4.17%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-25.36%	-6.56%	100.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEH and EZBC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

FLEH vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEH

FLEH Risk / Return Rank: 30
FLEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FLEH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FLEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLEH Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEH vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLEH	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	-0.89	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	-1.23	+2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.86	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	-0.79	+2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	-1.36	+6.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLEH vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEH Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEH and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLEH	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	-0.89	+1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.30	+0.27

Drawdowns

FLEH vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLEH	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-49.37%	+15.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-49.37%	+35.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-48.04%	+46.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-16.01%	+11.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	28.42%	-24.74%

Volatility

FLEH vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) is 6.75%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that FLEH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLEH	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	9.43%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	34.44%	-20.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	43.67%	-26.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	50.06%	-33.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.25%	50.06%	-31.81%

FLEH vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLEH vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF	2.09%	2.22%	3.18%	3.25%	21.45%	3.03%	1.94%	6.06%	12.17%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLEH and EZBC in my portfolio?

FLEH and EZBC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLEH or EZBC?

EZBC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FLEH (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs EZBC's -49.37%.

Which ETF is better, FLEH or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, FLEH leads with 18.35% vs -38.68% for EZBC. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEH has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLEH or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 18.35% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLEH or EZBC?

FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLEH or EZBC?

FLEH has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between FLEH and EZBC?

FLEH is categorized as Europe Equities, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEH and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLEH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.