PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEE vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEE vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEE achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 15.87% return.


FLEE

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.04%
6M
4.27%
YTD
9.38%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.57%

EWP

1D
0.07%
1M
3.05%
6M
10.97%
YTD
15.87%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
33.14%
5Y*
20.97%
10Y*
12.83%
ALL TIME*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.85M$23.74M$20.93M
$309.38K$221.20K$513.36K

FLEE vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
9.38%35.76%2.03%20.46%-15.22%16.84%5.33%24.41%-14.97%1.80%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
15.87%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEE and EWP is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FLEE and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLEE vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEE
EWP

Financial Services

24.4%
43.9%

Industrials

19.4%
16.3%

Healthcare

12.9%
1.3%

Technology

9.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.5%

Basic Materials

5.5%

-

Utilities

4.8%
21.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.4%

Financial Services

FLEE
24.4%
EWP
43.9%

Industrials

FLEE
19.4%
EWP
16.3%

Healthcare

FLEE
12.9%
EWP
1.3%

Technology

FLEE
9.8%
EWP
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLEE
8.3%
EWP

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLEE
6.7%
EWP
4.5%

Basic Materials

FLEE
5.5%
EWP

-

Utilities

FLEE
4.8%
EWP
21.9%

Energy

FLEE
4.4%
EWP
3.9%

Communication Services

FLEE
2.6%
EWP
2.4%

Real Estate

FLEE
1.0%
EWP
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEE vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLEE
FLEE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLEE vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLEEEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.67

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

13.09

-6.55

FLEE vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEE and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLEE vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEE drawdown since its inception was -37.27%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEE and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEEEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-61.19%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-11.38%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-12.19%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.62%

-30.26%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

0.00%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-21.33%

+14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.19%

+0.14%

Volatility

FLEE vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) is 4.51%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that FLEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEEEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

5.92%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

16.53%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

19.11%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

20.28%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

21.50%

-2.59%

FLEE vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEE vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

FLEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than EWP's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.71%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
3.13%2.76%3.93%2.57%3.48%3.61%1.88%3.02%3.85%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLEE and EWP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FLEE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEE dropped -37.27% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 5-year performance, EWP leads with 20.97% vs 9.49% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWP has performed better with a 20.97% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

FLEE has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.71% for EWP.

FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain 25/50 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEE and 0.50% for EWP.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEE and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer