FLDZ vs. RNMN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) and RNMN (RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by RiverNorth, while RNMN is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by RiverNorth. Both are actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLDZ charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for RNMN.

Performance

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -4.86%
• 6M: 1.59%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.21%

RNMN

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	$3.19K	$2.29K	$1.72K
RNMN RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF	$635.40	$23.64K	$23.64K

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	-3.77%
RNMN RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF	-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDZ and RNMN is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026	0.21

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLDZ	RNMN
Financial Services	15.5%	88.2%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	-
Healthcare	13.2%	-
Industrials	12.3%	-
Utilities	11.6%	-
Energy	10.3%	-
Real Estate	8.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Communication Services	4.2%	-
Technology	3.4%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	0.0%

Return for Risk

FLDZ vs. RNMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

RNMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLDZ	RNMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	—	—

Drawdowns

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDZ drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, which is greater than RNMN's maximum drawdown of -0.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDZ and RNMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDZ	RNMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.54%	-0.47%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-0.36%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-0.30%	-5.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLDZ	RNMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.62%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	1.86%	+11.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	1.86%	+15.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	1.86%	+15.18%

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDZ has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than RNMN's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDZ vs. RNMN - Dividend Comparison

FLDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while RNMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.49%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%
RNMN RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDZ and RNMN in my portfolio?

FLDZ and RNMN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLDZ or RNMN?

On fees, FLDZ is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDZ or RNMN?

FLDZ is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for RNMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDZ or RNMN?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for RNMN.

What is the main difference between FLDZ and RNMN?

FLDZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RNMN is Equity Market Neutral. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for FLDZ and 0.90% for RNMN.