PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDFX vs. UPAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLDFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.89%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.16%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
9.06%

UPAAX

1D
2.35%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLDFX and UPAAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDFX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDFX
FLDFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UPAAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDFXUPAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.96

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDFXUPAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

132.47

-131.94

Drawdowns

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDFX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDFX and UPAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDFXUPAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-0.25%

-36.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-0.08%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

Volatility

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDFXUPAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

21.58%

-12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

21.58%

-9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

21.58%

-10.98%

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison

FLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDFX
Meeder Balanced Fund
3.23%3.50%26.22%1.58%3.76%8.15%0.60%1.43%1.41%6.08%1.11%1.26%
UPAAX
Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDFX and UPAAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDFX and UPAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer