FLDFX vs. UPAAX
FLDFX (Meeder Balanced Fund) and UPAAX (Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLDFX charges 1.39%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for UPAAX.
Performance
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLDFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
UPAAX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | 0.48% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDFX and UPAAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDFX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDFX
UPAAX
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 132.47 | -131.94 |
Drawdowns
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDFX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDFX and UPAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -0.25% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -0.08% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | — | — |
Volatility
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 21.58% | -12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 21.58% | -9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 21.58% | -10.98% |
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLDFX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison
FLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | 3.23% | 3.50% | 26.22% | 1.58% | 3.76% | 8.15% | 0.60% | 1.43% | 1.41% | 6.08% | 1.11% | 1.26% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDFX and UPAAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FLDFX and UPAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer