FLDFX vs. SFHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX).
FLDFX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jan 30, 2006. SFHYX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 31, 2004.
Performance
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | -1.03% | 12.35% | 26.72% | 12.08% | -11.07% | 13.22% | 5.27% | 12.29% | -3.25% | 14.74% |
SFHYX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund | -1.07% | 10.99% | 2.78% | 9.94% | -10.31% | 8.05% | 37.42% | 9.31% | -2.80% | 8.95% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLDFX having a -1.03% return and SFHYX slightly lower at -1.07%. Over the past 10 years, FLDFX has outperformed SFHYX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while SFHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.42% annualized return.
FLDFX
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 12.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
SFHYX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SFHYX's 2.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLDFX vs. SFHYX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDFX
SFHYX
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDFX | SFHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 2.14 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.88 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.46 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | 8.60 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDFX | SFHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.14 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.46 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 1.19 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.25 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDFX and SFHYX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Dividend Comparison
FLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than SFHYX's 9.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | 3.55% | 3.50% | 26.22% | 1.58% | 3.76% | 8.15% | 0.60% | 1.43% | 1.41% | 6.08% | 1.11% | 1.26% |
SFHYX Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund | 9.65% | 9.54% | 5.68% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 10.21% | 13.57% | 4.95% | 2.55% | 10.24% | 4.93% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDFX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than SFHYX's maximum drawdown of -17.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDFX and SFHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDFX | SFHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -17.34% | -19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -3.75% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -14.37% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.41% | -14.37% | -6.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.49% | -3.66% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -2.75% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.07% | +0.83% |
Volatility
FLDFX vs. SFHYX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX) at 1.71%. This indicates that FLDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDFX | SFHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 1.71% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 3.69% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 4.40% | +6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 6.34% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 6.27% | +4.29% |