FLDFX vs. PDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX).
FLDFX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jan 30, 2006. PDX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2019.
Performance
FLDFX vs. PDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDFX vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | -2.80% | 12.35% | 26.72% | 12.08% | -11.07% | 13.22% | 5.27% | 10.89% |
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 19.83% | -10.59% | 36.99% | 44.51% | 23.02% | 68.79% | -44.20% | -10.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDFX achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 19.83% return.
FLDFX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
PDX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 19.83%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDFX vs. PDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PDX's 2.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLDFX vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDFX
PDX
FLDFX vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDFX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.54 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.83 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.71 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 1.74 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDFX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.54 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.07 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.32 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDFX and PDX is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLDFX vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison
FLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than PDX's 20.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund | 3.61% | 3.50% | 26.22% | 1.58% | 3.76% | 8.15% | 0.60% | 1.43% | 1.41% | 6.08% | 1.11% | 1.26% |
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 20.72% | 24.34% | 6.31% | 4.30% | 5.89% | 5.28% | 14.11% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLDFX vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDFX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDFX and PDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDFX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -80.63% | +43.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -20.21% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -37.24% | +16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -12.96% | +5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -18.92% | +10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 8.25% | -6.38% |
Volatility
FLDFX vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) is 3.68%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FLDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDFX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 4.60% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.87% | 11.16% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 22.72% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 25.78% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 36.86% | -26.31% |