FLCV vs. PRXV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

FLCV vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLCV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRXV

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCV vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	4.73%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCV and PRXV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

FLCV vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCV

FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCV vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCV	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCV	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	4.54	-3.21

Drawdowns

FLCV vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCV	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-1.18%	-14.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-0.32%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLCV	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	9.66%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	9.66%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	9.66%	+5.29%

FLCV vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCV vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	0.73%	0.83%	0.24%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCV and PRXV in my portfolio?

FLCV and PRXV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCV or PRXV?

On fees, FLCV is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCV or PRXV?

FLCV is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCV or PRXV?

FLCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

What is the main difference between FLCV and PRXV?

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.36% for PRXV.