FLCV vs. LVDS
FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLCV returned 21.35% vs 27.03% for LVDS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.
Performance
FLCV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 18.27% return.
FLCV
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | 15.35% | 5.20% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 18.27% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCV and LVDS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.89 |
FLCV vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCV
LVDS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FLCV
LVDS
Financial Services
FLCV
LVDS
Healthcare
FLCV
LVDS
Industrials
FLCV
LVDS
Consumer Cyclical
FLCV
LVDS
Communication Services
FLCV
LVDS
Consumer Defensive
FLCV
LVDS
Utilities
FLCV
LVDS
Energy
FLCV
LVDS
Real Estate
FLCV
LVDS
Basic Materials
FLCV
LVDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCV vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank
FLCV
LVDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLCV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and LVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.93% | -6.64% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -6.64% | +0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.02% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -0.93% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FLCV vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 10.59% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 10.59% | +4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 10.59% | +4.24% |
FLCV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison
FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than LVDS's 7.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.24% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.61% | 8.25% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCV and LVDS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, LVDS leads with 27.03% vs 21.35% for FLCV. On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LVDS has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 21.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for FLCV.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 0.72% for FLCV.
They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.30% for LVDS.
Find the right allocation for FLCV and LVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer