PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCV vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 18.27% return.


FLCV

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.26%
YTD
15.35%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.26%
1M
2.78%
6M
15.06%
YTD
18.27%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLCV and LVDS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.89

FLCV vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCV
LVDS

Technology

20.4%
18.7%

Financial Services

18.5%
18.7%

Healthcare

12.3%
10.1%

Industrials

11.5%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
6.4%

Utilities

5.7%
4.7%

Energy

5.3%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.7%

Technology

FLCV
20.4%
LVDS
18.7%

Financial Services

FLCV
18.5%
LVDS
18.7%

Healthcare

FLCV
12.3%
LVDS
10.1%

Industrials

FLCV
11.5%
LVDS
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCV
7.5%
LVDS
8.4%

Communication Services

FLCV
6.9%
LVDS
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLCV
5.7%
LVDS
6.4%

Utilities

FLCV
5.7%
LVDS
4.7%

Energy

FLCV
5.3%
LVDS
6.6%

Real Estate

FLCV
2.8%
LVDS
4.1%

Basic Materials

FLCV
2.8%
LVDS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCV vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCV
FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LVDS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCVLVDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

FLCV vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCVLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.93%

-6.64%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

-6.64%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.02%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-0.93%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

FLCV vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCVLVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

10.59%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

10.59%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

10.59%

+4.24%

FLCV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than LVDS's 7.61% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLCV and LVDS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, LVDS leads with 27.03% vs 21.35% for FLCV. On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LVDS has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 21.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for FLCV.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 0.72% for FLCV.

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCV and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer