PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCPX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLCPX having a 11.72% return and FZROX slightly higher at 12.01%.


FLCPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.81%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.75%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.67%

FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
11.72%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-11.11%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCPX and FZROX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FLCPX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCPX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCPXFZROXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.47

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

3.36

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.39

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.75

15.66

+0.09

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCPX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCPXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.47

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.77

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.73

+0.20

Drawdowns

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCPX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCPX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCPXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-34.96%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.89%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.38%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-25.12%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-5.51%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.92%

-0.02%

Volatility

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) is 2.82%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that FLCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCPXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.99%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

9.22%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

12.22%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.44%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

20.13%

-1.97%

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCPX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FZROX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.50%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FLCPX and FZROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZROX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCPX dropped -33.87% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCPX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer