PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCPX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCPX achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCPX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 15.67%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FLCPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.81%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.75%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.67%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
11.72%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCPX and FCNTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.92

The correlation between FLCPX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCPX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCPXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.72

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

2.39

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.13

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.75

9.04

+6.71

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCPX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCPXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.72

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.89

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.78

+0.15

Drawdowns

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCPX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCPX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCPXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-49.19%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.30%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.75%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-32.59%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-32.59%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-8.16%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.65%

-0.75%

Volatility

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) is 2.82%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FLCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCPXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.26%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

10.48%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

14.03%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

19.15%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

19.68%

-1.52%

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCPX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.50%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCPX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCPX dropped -33.87% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCPX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer