PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCPX vs. AGRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCPX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than AGRDX's 7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCPX has underperformed AGRDX with an annualized return of 15.58%, while AGRDX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.11% annualized return.


FLCPX

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.82%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.58%

AGRDX

1D
-1.56%
1M
5.45%
YTD
7.03%
6M
6.02%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
17.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
10.91%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%
AGRDX
JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6
7.03%15.66%26.66%43.81%-31.15%28.29%35.69%35.89%-1.22%29.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCPX and AGRDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.92

The correlation between FLCPX and AGRDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCPX vs. AGRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AGRDX
AGRDX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AGRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCPXAGRDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.52

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

5.09

+9.76

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the AGRDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCPX and AGRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCPXAGRDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.60

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.61

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.81

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Drawdowns

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCPX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, roughly equal to the maximum AGRDX drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCPX and AGRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCPXAGRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-34.73%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-16.55%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-24.12%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-34.73%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-34.73%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-2.07%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-5.90%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

4.95%

-3.05%

Volatility

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) is 2.91%, while JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that FLCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCPXAGRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.92%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

12.01%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

15.79%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

21.59%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

21.32%

-3.16%

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCPX vs. AGRDX - Dividend Comparison

FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than AGRDX's 15.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGRDX
JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6
15.19%16.25%5.72%4.64%5.01%9.55%5.24%5.86%13.94%9.95%4.58%6.71%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.51%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLCPX and AGRDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AGRDX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to FLCPX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCPX dropped -33.87% vs AGRDX's -34.73%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCPX and AGRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer