PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCOX vs. QNZNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCOX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than QNZNX's 11.60% return.


FLCOX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.49%
YTD
15.46%
6M
14.24%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

QNZNX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
11.60%
6M
11.33%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
15.46%15.90%14.38%11.48%-4.72%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
11.60%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCOX and QNZNX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.50

The correlation between FLCOX and QNZNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCOX vs. QNZNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCOXQNZNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

5.33

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

21.75

-4.90

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the QNZNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCOX and QNZNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCOX drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, which is greater than QNZNX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCOX and QNZNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOXQNZNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-18.38%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-5.89%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-13.48%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-5.89%

+4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-2.78%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.44%

+0.19%

Volatility

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOXQNZNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.07%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

7.85%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

11.27%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

12.11%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

12.11%

+5.51%

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCOX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QNZNX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCOX vs. QNZNX - Dividend Comparison

FLCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than QNZNX's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.31%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.77%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCOX and QNZNX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCOX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to QNZNX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCOX dropped -38.28% vs QNZNX's -18.38%.

QNZNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCOX and QNZNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer