PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCOX vs. HLQVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCOX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than HLQVX's 8.29% return.


FLCOX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.49%
YTD
15.46%
6M
14.24%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

HLQVX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.79%
YTD
8.29%
6M
6.87%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
15.46%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
8.29%15.67%27.12%11.35%-0.11%23.57%10.54%27.44%-15.21%17.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCOX and HLQVX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FLCOX and HLQVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCOX vs. HLQVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HLQVX
HLQVX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HLQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HLQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCOXHLQVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.32

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

7.72

+9.12

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the HLQVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCOX and HLQVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCOX drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, smaller than the maximum HLQVX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCOX and HLQVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOXHLQVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-60.03%

+21.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-9.31%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-16.11%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-18.38%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.17%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-9.38%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.79%

-1.16%

Volatility

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) is 4.14%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that FLCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLQVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOXHLQVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.71%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

9.78%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

12.84%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

16.37%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

20.30%

-2.68%

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCOX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HLQVX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCOX vs. HLQVX - Dividend Comparison

FLCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than HLQVX's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.31%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
7.39%8.05%20.76%5.44%5.80%8.22%1.05%1.38%9.09%9.21%5.91%14.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FLCOX and HLQVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HLQVX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FLCOX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCOX dropped -38.28% vs HLQVX's -60.03%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCOX and HLQVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer