FLCNX vs. ATVPX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX).

FLCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. ATVPX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Mar 29, 2018.

Performance

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLCNX Fidelity Contrafund K6	-4.95%	22.05%	35.37%	37.67%	-27.13%	24.21%	30.85%	14.48%
ATVPX Alger 35 Fund	-7.66%	32.51%	50.84%	31.41%	-36.36%	10.91%	68.05%	14.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCNX achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly higher than ATVPX's -7.66% return.

FLCNX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -4.12%
• YTD: -4.95%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 19.90%
• 3Y*: 24.88%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

ATVPX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: -7.66%
• 6M: -10.40%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 30.03%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ATVPX's 0.55% expense ratio.

ATVPX

Alger 35 Fund

FLCNX

Fidelity Contrafund K6

Return for Risk

FLCNX vs. ATVPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCNX

FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ATVPX

ATVPX Risk / Return Rank: 78
ATVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ATVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ATVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ATVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ATVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCNX	ATVPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.56	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.19	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	2.63	-0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	8.90	-1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ATVPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCNX and ATVPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCNX	ATVPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.56	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.31	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.58	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FLCNX and ATVPX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Dividend Comparison

FLCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, less than ATVPX's 23.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCNX Fidelity Contrafund K6	12.08%	8.35%	0.36%	0.49%	1.18%	0.46%	0.21%	0.30%	0.33%	0.15%
ATVPX Alger 35 Fund	23.02%	21.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	36.00%	17.24%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum ATVPX drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCNX and ATVPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCNX	ATVPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-53.35%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-16.74%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.07%	-53.35%	+21.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.82%	-12.09%	+4.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-18.36%	+11.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	4.95%	-1.83%

Volatility

FLCNX vs. ATVPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) is 6.72%, while Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that FLCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATVPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCNX	ATVPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	9.45%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	17.73%	-6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.47%	27.35%	-6.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	33.47%	-14.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.52%	31.95%	-11.43%