PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCE vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCE vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCE achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.00% return.


FLCE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.40%
6M
7.64%
YTD
8.98%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.85%

BLCR

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.52%
6M
12.15%
YTD
15.00%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.05M$18.88M$32.16M
$105.93K$126.48K$234.04K

FLCE vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLCE
Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
8.98%14.45%-1.21%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
15.00%30.93%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCE and BLCR is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.89

The correlation between FLCE and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCE vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCE
FLCE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCE vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCEBLCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.99

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

11.94

-3.50

FLCE vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCE and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCE vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCE drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCE and BLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCEBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-21.29%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-10.26%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-4.18%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-2.24%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.56%

-0.49%

Volatility

FLCE vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) is 3.38%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that FLCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCEBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

5.68%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

13.89%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

17.19%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.71%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.71%

-1.88%

FLCE vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCE vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

FLCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than BLCR's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.29%0.33%0.75%0.13%
FLCE
Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.31%0.32%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCE and BLCR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLCR has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FLCE (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCE dropped -17.52% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 32.42% vs 18.99% for FLCE. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FLCE has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 32.42% return vs 18.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FLCE.

FLCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FLCE and 0.36% for BLCR.

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCE and BLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer