FLBL vs. TBLL
FLBL (Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF) and TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLBL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. FLBL is actively managed, while TBLL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLBL returned 5.21%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for TBLL. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLBL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TBLL.
Performance
FLBL vs. TBLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLBL achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than TBLL's 1.43% return.
FLBL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FLBL vs. TBLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | 0.91% | 3.59% | 8.26% | 14.83% | -2.69% | 4.35% | 2.17% | 7.67% | -1.63% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.43% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLBL and TBLL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018 | 0.00 |
The correlation between FLBL and TBLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLBL vs. TBLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLBL
TBLL
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FLBL
TBLL
Consumer Cyclical
FLBL
TBLL
-
Healthcare
FLBL
TBLL
-
Industrials
FLBL
TBLL
-
Basic Materials
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Communication Services
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Consumer Defensive
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Energy
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Real Estate
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Technology
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Utilities
FLBL
-
TBLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLBL vs. TBLL — Risk / Return Rank
FLBL
TBLL
FLBL vs. TBLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLBL | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -20.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -217.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 102.92 | -101.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 416.84 | -416.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | 3,533.11 | -3,530.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLBL | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 20.94 | -20.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.36 | 7.53 | -6.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 4.26 | -3.46 |
Drawdowns
FLBL vs. TBLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLBL drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, which is greater than TBLL's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBL and TBLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLBL | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.52% | -0.63% | -18.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -0.01% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.91% | -0.36% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.80% | -0.36% | -6.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -0.14% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.00% | +0.94% |
Volatility
FLBL vs. TBLL - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) at 0.05%. This indicates that FLBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLBL | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 0.05% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 0.12% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 0.19% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 0.45% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 0.56% | +5.16% |
FLBL vs. TBLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLBL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLBL vs. TBLL - Dividend Comparison
FLBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than TBLL's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | 7.58% | 7.24% | 8.05% | 8.37% | 5.53% | 3.57% | 3.22% | 3.97% | 2.21% | 0.00% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLBL and TBLL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLBL has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBL dropped -19.52% vs TBLL's -0.63%.
On 5-year performance, FLBL leads with 5.21% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLBL has performed better with a 5.21% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLBL.
FLBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 3.81% for TBLL.
FLBL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TBLL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLBL and 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLBL and TBLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer