FLAO vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLAO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. FLAO is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, FLAO returned 3.17% vs 68.34% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. FLAO charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

FLAO vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAO achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

FLAO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: -1.22%
• YTD: -0.29%
• 1Y: 3.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAO vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLAO AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF	-0.29%	3.38%	9.91%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-33.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAO and BITI is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

FLAO vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAO

FLAO Risk / Return Rank: 19
FLAO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLAO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FLAO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FLAO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FLAO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAO vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLAO	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.56	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	2.13	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.26	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.72	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	6.78	-5.11

FLAO vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAO and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLAO vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAO and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLAO	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.12%	-92.16%	+82.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.60%	-25.28%	+17.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-85.94%	+84.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-68.34%	+66.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	10.11%	-8.20%

Volatility

FLAO vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) is 0.62%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that FLAO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLAO	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	11.38%	-10.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.05%	34.25%	-29.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	44.14%	-38.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	52.28%	-44.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.34%	52.28%	-44.94%

FLAO vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLAO vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

FLAO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
FLAO AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLAO and BITI in my portfolio?

FLAO and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLAO or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to FLAO (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAO dropped -10.12% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, FLAO or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 3.17% for FLAO. On fees, FLAO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLAO has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLAO or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLAO or BITI?

FLAO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLAO or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.00% for FLAO.

What is the main difference between FLAO and BITI?

FLAO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FLAO and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.