FLACX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLACX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FLACX returned 14.49%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLACX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLACX achieves a 15.32% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FLACX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

FLACX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 15.32%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 35.98%
• 3Y*: 23.13%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.49%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLACX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C	15.32%	17.65%	23.13%	25.62%	-20.42%	21.82%	23.53%	30.77%	-9.60%	22.30%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLACX and FCNTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.93

The correlation between FLACX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLACX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLACX

FLACX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FLACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FLACX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FLACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLACX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLACX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	1.72	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	2.39	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	2.13	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.11	9.04	+10.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLACX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLACX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	1.72	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.79	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.89	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.78	0.00

Drawdowns

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLACX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLACX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLACX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-49.19%	+14.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-11.30%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.41%	-19.75%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.99%	-32.59%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.42%	-32.59%	-1.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.53%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-8.16%	+3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.65%	-0.73%

Volatility

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLACX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.26%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	10.48%	-0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.99%	14.03%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	19.15%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	19.68%	-1.09%

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLACX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLACX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FLACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FLACX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C	3.78%	4.36%	7.56%	1.35%	0.08%	0.16%	4.20%	4.87%	3.49%	1.36%	0.00%	4.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLACX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FLACX and FCNTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLACX or FCNTX?

FLACX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLACX dropped -34.42% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.