PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLACX vs. EFCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FLACX has underperformed EFCNX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while EFCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.46% annualized return.


FLACX

1D
0.33%
1M
5.80%
YTD
15.32%
6M
15.78%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.49%

EFCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLACX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C
15.32%17.65%23.13%25.62%-20.42%21.82%23.53%30.77%-9.60%22.30%
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
0.00%28.71%25.88%40.82%-31.09%22.95%49.60%36.32%-9.88%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLACX and EFCNX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FLACX and EFCNX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLACX vs. EFCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLACX
FLACX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FLACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLACX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLACX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EFCNX
EFCNX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EFCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EFCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLACXEFCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.84

3.86

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

6.20

-2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.65

-1.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

12.23

-8.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.11

70.23

-51.12

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the EFCNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLACX and EFCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLACXEFCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

3.86

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.50

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.63

+0.15

Drawdowns

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLACX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum EFCNX drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLACX and EFCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLACXEFCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-38.34%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-2.90%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-27.61%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-38.34%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.42%

-38.34%

+3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-8.64%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.94%

+0.98%

Volatility

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C (FLACX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FLACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLACXEFCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

0.00%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

0.00%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

9.27%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

22.89%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

22.80%

-4.21%

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLACX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EFCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLACX vs. EFCNX - Dividend Comparison

FLACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than EFCNX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
8.50%8.50%1.27%0.00%5.41%15.80%9.41%0.04%27.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLACX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class C
3.78%4.36%7.56%1.35%0.08%0.16%4.20%4.87%3.49%1.36%0.00%4.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLACX and EFCNX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLACX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to EFCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLACX dropped -34.42% vs EFCNX's -38.34%.

EFCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLACX and EFCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer