PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKRFX vs. FIRVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRFX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than FIRVX's 1,440,933.92% return.


FKRFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.67%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*

FIRVX

1D
1,371,718.18%
1M
1,382,668.54%
YTD
1,440,933.92%
6M
1,442,468.36%
1Y
1,545,588.89%
3Y*
2,512.79%
5Y*
597.67%
10Y*
176.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FKRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K
4.56%13.44%6.67%11.94%-15.58%8.11%13.21%6.18%
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
1,440,933.92%12.25%5.86%10.72%-14.63%6.77%12.06%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRFX and FIRVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FKRFX and FIRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKRFX vs. FIRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRFX
FKRFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FKRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRVX
FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKRFXFIRVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-351,352.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

49,085.82

-49,084.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

356,370.91

-356,368.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

1,512,145.77

-1,512,134.47

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the FIRVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRFX and FIRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRFX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum FIRVX drawdown of -40.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRFX and FIRVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKRFXFIRVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-40.59%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-4.51%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.23%

-6.52%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-20.10%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-4.97%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.06%

+0.12%

Volatility

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) is 2.66%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a volatility of 952.63%. This indicates that FKRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKRFXFIRVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

952.63%

-949.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.55%

952.62%

-947.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

1,374,447.92%

-1,374,441.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.22%

614,671.81%

-614,663.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

434,465.54%

-434,456.35%

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRFX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRVX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKRFX vs. FIRVX - Dividend Comparison

FKRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FIRVX's 102.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
102.87%2.83%2.74%2.57%3.52%4.61%3.74%3.18%6.90%25.16%2.28%4.45%
FKRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K
3.78%2.68%2.58%2.59%4.86%5.20%3.66%3.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FKRFX and FIRVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to FKRFX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRFX dropped -21.50% vs FIRVX's -40.59%.

FKRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKRFX and FIRVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer