FKNIX vs. MUC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FKNIX (Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FKNIX returned 1.57%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MUC. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FKNIX charges 0.70%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.

Performance

FKNIX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund (FKNIX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKNIX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FKNIX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.57%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.

FKNIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: 1.57%

MUC

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 6M: 6.05%
• 1Y: 12.06%
• 3Y*: 5.91%
• 5Y*: -2.32%
• 10Y*: 0.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKNIX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKNIX Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund	1.25%	5.32%	1.49%	5.07%	-7.83%	0.80%	3.90%	6.48%	0.37%	3.20%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.75%	5.96%	0.76%	7.86%	-26.81%	7.38%	11.85%	18.12%	-9.00%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FKNIX and MUC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 1998	0.25

Over the past year, FKNIX and MUC have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FKNIX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKNIX

FKNIX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FKNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FKNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FKNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FKNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FKNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MUC

MUC Risk / Return Rank: 36
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKNIX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund (FKNIX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKNIX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	1.48	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.23	2.33	+1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.29	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.86	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	7.52	+0.18

FKNIX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKNIX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKNIX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKNIX drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKNIX and MUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKNIX	MUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-48.97%	+36.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-6.53%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.65%	-14.51%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.69%	-38.29%	+25.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.69%	-38.29%	+25.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-15.15%	+14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-9.91%	+8.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	1.61%	-0.88%

Volatility

FKNIX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund (FKNIX) is 0.55%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that FKNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKNIX	MUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	2.14%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	6.35%	-4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	8.18%	-6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.16%	11.51%	-8.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	11.89%	-8.37%

FKNIX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKNIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKNIX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

FKNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than MUC's 5.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKNIX Franklin New York Intermediate Tax-Free Income Fund	2.77%	3.55%	2.97%	2.10%	2.11%	1.91%	2.26%	2.95%	2.64%	2.38%	2.59%	2.67%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.90%	6.06%	5.62%	3.84%	5.79%	4.27%	3.96%	3.90%	4.99%	5.14%	5.45%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKNIX and MUC in my portfolio?

FKNIX and MUC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKNIX or MUC?

MUC has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to FKNIX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKNIX dropped -12.69% vs MUC's -48.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.