FKIFX vs. FIKFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FKIFX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class) and FIKFX (Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FKIFX returned 5.40%/yr vs 4.24%/yr for FIKFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIFX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FKIFX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.

FKIFX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.71%
• 1Y: 11.49%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

FIKFX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 4.19%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: 7.66%
• 5Y*: 3.25%
• 10Y*: 4.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class	4.56%	10.21%	5.70%	9.83%	-12.94%	5.05%	10.41%	14.33%	-2.62%	9.81%
FIKFX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class	4.19%	9.23%	4.96%	8.28%	-11.09%	2.79%	8.54%	10.59%	-0.76%	6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIFX and FIKFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2009	0.92

The correlation between FKIFX and FIKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKIFX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIFX

FKIFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FKIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FKIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FKIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FKIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FKIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FIKFX

FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKIFX	FIKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.63	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	3.92	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.54	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.15	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	14.03	+0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIFX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKIFX	FIKFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	2.63	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.64	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.96	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.01	-0.16

Drawdowns

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIFX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIFX and FIKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKIFX	FIKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-15.03%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.68%	-3.32%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.72%	-4.76%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	-15.03%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.50%	-15.03%	-2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-1.72%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.74%	+0.08%

Volatility

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FKIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKIFX	FIKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	1.49%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.65%	3.31%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	3.98%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.13%	5.12%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.13%	4.44%	+1.69%

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FKIFX and FIKFX have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FKIFX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

FKIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than FIKFX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKFX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class	3.19%	3.40%	3.13%	2.85%	3.06%	2.04%	2.18%	7.27%	2.94%	1.89%	1.65%	1.39%
FKIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class	3.74%	4.53%	4.99%	3.28%	3.71%	3.61%	2.56%	16.42%	4.74%	1.84%	1.84%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKIFX and FIKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FKIFX and FIKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FKIFX or FIKFX?

FKIFX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FIKFX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIFX dropped -17.50% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.