PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKGRX vs. SBLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKGRX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than SBLGX's 4.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKGRX having a 14.04% annualized return and SBLGX not far ahead at 14.37%.


FKGRX

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.71%
YTD
6.28%
6M
5.87%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
14.04%

SBLGX

1D
-1.54%
1M
4.43%
YTD
4.27%
6M
3.64%
1Y
10.99%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
6.28%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
4.27%8.44%27.60%45.00%-32.96%21.71%30.84%31.69%-0.44%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FKGRX and SBLGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.92

The correlation between FKGRX and SBLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKGRX vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLGX
SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKGRXSBLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.14

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.69

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

2.10

+4.73

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SBLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKGRX and SBLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKGRXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.77

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.47

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.48

+0.23

Drawdowns

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKGRX drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLGX drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKGRX and SBLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKGRXSBLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-53.64%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-16.95%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.72%

-20.98%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-38.28%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.52%

-38.28%

+5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-2.13%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-12.91%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

5.53%

-2.72%

Volatility

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) is 3.19%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that FKGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKGRXSBLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

4.02%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

11.63%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

15.18%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

21.16%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

20.45%

-0.92%

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKGRX vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison

FKGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than SBLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
13.52%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.68%5.39%12.39%9.34%12.48%6.17%5.12%4.00%4.41%2.08%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FKGRX and SBLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SBLGX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FKGRX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKGRX dropped -51.08% vs SBLGX's -53.64%.

FKGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKGRX and SBLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer