FJUN vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FJUN returned 11.39% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

FJUN vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

FJUN

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 4.52%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 1Y: 11.39%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.45%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	$1.32M	$1.99M	$4.44M
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

FJUN vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	5.31%	11.05%	9.48%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

FJUN vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 81
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJUN vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUN	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.27	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.95	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.35	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	5.19	+8.80

FJUN vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUN	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	-91.35%	+78.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-47.94%	+43.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-77.87%	+77.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-69.07%	+67.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	21.67%	-20.91%

Volatility

FJUN vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 2.37%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUN	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	18.09%	-15.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	67.10%	-62.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.07%	88.65%	-82.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.58%	96.10%	-85.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.21%	96.10%	-85.89%

FJUN vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUN vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUN and SBIT in my portfolio?

FJUN and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJUN or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to FJUN (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, FJUN or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 11.39% for FJUN. On fees, FJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUN or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUN or SBIT?

FJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUN or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between FJUN and SBIT?

FJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.