PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUN vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJUN vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.


FJUN

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.64%
6M
5.30%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
4.64%11.05%7.38%
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
32.45%-3.52%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and RSSY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024

0.57

The correlation between FJUN and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJUN vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN
FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJUNRSSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.65

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

6.53

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

22.39

-3.41

FJUN vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJUNRSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.63

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.75

+0.42

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJUNRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-29.57%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-7.36%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.16%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-7.37%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

2.14%

-1.41%

Volatility

FJUN vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJUNRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.30%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

9.92%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

13.28%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

18.35%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.27%

18.35%

-8.08%

FJUN vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJUN vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FJUN and RSSY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSY has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 13.82% for FJUN. On fees, FJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 13.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJUN and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer