FJUN vs. FTXL
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUN returned 11.05%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
FJUN vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.64% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 36.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and FTXL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FJUN and FTXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FJUN vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJUN
FTXL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FJUN
FTXL
Financial Services
FJUN
FTXL
-
Communication Services
FJUN
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FJUN
FTXL
-
Healthcare
FJUN
FTXL
-
Industrials
FJUN
FTXL
Consumer Defensive
FJUN
FTXL
-
Energy
FJUN
FTXL
-
Utilities
FJUN
FTXL
-
Real Estate
FJUN
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
FJUN
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
FTXL
FJUN vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUN | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.78 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 15.62 | -12.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 58.28 | -39.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUN | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 6.33 | -4.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.94 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -43.87% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -14.51% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -41.57% | +28.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -43.87% | +30.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -10.56% | +8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 3.88% | -3.15% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 14.28% | -13.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 28.98% | -24.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 35.94% | -29.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 36.02% | -25.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 34.25% | -23.98% |
FJUN vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJUN and FTXL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer