FJUL vs. IVVM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. FJUL is passively managed, while IVVM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FJUL returned 14.53%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for IVVM. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVM.

Performance

FJUL vs. IVVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUL achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than IVVM's 6.70% return.

FJUL

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 6.71%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.97%

IVVM

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 5.79%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 1Y: 14.40%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	$4.22M	$3.10M	$2.24M
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	$740.71K	$781.13K	$703.06K

FJUL vs. IVVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	7.54%	14.19%	17.65%	8.13%
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	6.70%	14.24%	16.08%	5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUL and IVVM is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.90

The correlation between FJUL and IVVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJUL vs. IVVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJUL

FJUL Risk / Return Rank: 85
FJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

IVVM

IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 79
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJUL vs. IVVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUL	IVVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.78	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.55	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.49	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.19	12.04	+2.15

FJUL vs. IVVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the IVVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUL and IVVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUL vs. IVVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUL drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than IVVM's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUL and IVVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUL	IVVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.08%	-11.62%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-5.31%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.08%	-11.62%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.40%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-0.90%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	1.10%	-0.13%

Volatility

FJUL vs. IVVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is 1.92%, while iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that FJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUL	IVVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	2.14%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.26%	5.77%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.87%	7.42%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.97%	9.50%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.47%	9.50%	+0.97%

FJUL vs. IVVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUL vs. IVVM - Dividend Comparison

FJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	0.64%	0.68%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUL and IVVM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FJUL and IVVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJUL or IVVM?

IVVM has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to FJUL (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUL dropped -13.08% vs IVVM's -11.62%.

Which ETF is better, FJUL or IVVM?

On 3-year performance, FJUL leads with 14.53% vs 13.47% for IVVM. On fees, IVVM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUL or IVVM?

Over the 3-year period, FJUL has performed better with a 14.53% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUL or IVVM?

IVVM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUL or IVVM?

IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for FJUL.

What is the main difference between FJUL and IVVM?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUL and 0.50% for IVVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.