FJUL vs. IVVM
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM).
FJUL and IVVM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FJUL is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. It was launched on Jul 16, 2020. IVVM is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 28, 2023.
Performance
FJUL vs. IVVM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FJUL vs. IVVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | -2.14% | 14.19% | 17.65% | 6.72% |
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | -1.95% | 14.24% | 16.08% | 5.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUL achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than IVVM's -1.95% return.
FJUL
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IVVM
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FJUL vs. IVVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FJUL vs. IVVM — Risk / Return Rank
FJUL
IVVM
FJUL vs. IVVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUL | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.96 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.48 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.38 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 7.89 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUL | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.96 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.24 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUL and IVVM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FJUL vs. IVVM - Dividend Comparison
FJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
FJUL vs. IVVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUL drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than IVVM's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUL and IVVM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUL | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -11.62% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -9.29% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -3.21% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -0.96% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.63% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FJUL vs. IVVM - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FJUL | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.76% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 6.03% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 12.91% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 9.83% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.68% | 9.83% | +0.85% |