PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUL vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FJUL vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FJUL vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
-2.14%14.19%10.29%
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
-12.29%9.69%15.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUL achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's -12.29% return.


FJUL

1D
1.89%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

FDND

1D
3.15%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-12.29%
6M
-15.83%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FJUL vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FJUL vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUL
FJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUL vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJULFDNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.18

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

0.43

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.18

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.65

0.49

+9.16

FJUL vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUL and FDND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJULFDNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.18

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.26

+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between FJUL and FDND is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FJUL vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

FJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%.


Drawdowns

FJUL vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUL drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUL and FDND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FJULFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-24.12%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-20.49%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-17.99%

+14.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-5.37%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

7.51%

-5.93%

Volatility

FJUL vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is 3.60%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that FJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FJULFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

6.98%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

14.36%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

23.45%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

21.67%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.68%

21.67%

-10.99%