FJUL vs. BUFD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and BUFD (FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUL is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while BUFD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. FJUL is passively managed, while BUFD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUL returned 11.37%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for BUFD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFD.

Performance

FJUL vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUL achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly higher than BUFD's 4.60% return.

FJUL

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: —

BUFD

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUL vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	5.84%	14.19%	17.65%	21.33%	-6.25%	9.99%
BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF	4.60%	10.66%	12.42%	15.40%	-7.70%	5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUL and BUFD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.87

The correlation between FJUL and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJUL vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUL

FJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BUFD

BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUL vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUL	BUFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.38	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	3.60	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.49	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.62	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	19.33	-2.42

FJUL vs. BUFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the BUFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUL and BUFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUL vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUL drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than BUFD's maximum drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUL and BUFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUL	BUFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.08%	-10.75%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-3.43%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.08%	-10.15%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.08%	-10.75%	-2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.67%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-1.95%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.64%	+0.33%

Volatility

FJUL vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is 1.26%, while FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that FJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUL	BUFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.66%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.14%	4.17%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81%	5.22%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.97%	7.75%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.52%	7.54%	+2.98%

FJUL vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUL vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FJUL nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUL and BUFD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FJUL and BUFD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJUL or BUFD?

BUFD has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FJUL (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUL dropped -13.08% vs BUFD's -10.75%.

Which ETF is better, FJUL or BUFD?

On 5-year performance, FJUL leads with 11.37% vs 7.31% for BUFD. On fees, FJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUL or BUFD?

Over the 5-year period, FJUL has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUL or BUFD?

FJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUL or BUFD?

FJUL and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FJUL and BUFD?

FJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFD is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUL and 0.95% for BUFD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.