PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FJTSY is traded in USD, while GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GRT-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJTSY achieves a -19.33% return, which is significantly lower than GRT-UN.TO's 17.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FJTSY has outperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 19.10%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.


FJTSY

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-19.33%
6M
-15.00%
1Y
-6.35%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
19.10%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
1.06%
YTD
17.48%
6M
27.32%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
-19.33%55.98%17.49%12.77%-22.86%19.18%54.48%49.76%-12.38%29.23%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
17.48%28.67%-11.77%17.98%-35.94%40.23%25.54%35.22%5.57%24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.15

The correlation between FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FJTSY:

$38.24B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

EPS

FJTSY:

$257.52

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

FJTSY:

0.09

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

PEG Ratio

FJTSY:

0.00

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

FJTSY:

0.01

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

PB Ratio

FJTSY:

0.02

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

FJTSY:

$3.55T

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FJTSY:

$1.32T

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

FJTSY:

$439.05B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJTSY
FJTSY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FJTSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTSY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTSY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJTSYGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.34

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

2.91

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

9.25

-9.67

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJTSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJTSYGRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

1.96

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.20

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.57

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.28

-0.06

Drawdowns

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJTSY drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown of -89.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJTSYGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-89.30%

+27.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.59%

-13.29%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.59%

-31.60%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.55%

-43.95%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.55%

-49.61%

+2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.33%

-1.40%

-22.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-18.54%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.04%

4.17%

+10.87%

Volatility

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.88%. This indicates that FJTSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJTSYGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

5.88%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.57%

15.54%

+19.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.06%

19.70%

+23.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.78%

23.11%

+10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.81%

23.53%

+8.28%

Dividends

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

FJTSY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
0.00%0.36%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.30%1.30%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fujitsu Ltd ADR and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
1.07T
165.83M
(FJTSY) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FJTSY values in USD, GRT-UN.TO values in CAD

FJTSY vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fujitsu Ltd ADR and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
42.8%
81.0%
Portfolio components
FJTSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 458.88B and revenue of 1.07T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

FJTSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 154.67B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

FJTSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a net income of 107.66B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJTSY and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer