FJRLX vs. FANCX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FJRLX (Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund) and FANCX (Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FJRLX returned 2.09%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FANCX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJRLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for FANCX.

Performance

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJRLX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than FANCX's 0.11% return.

FJRLX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

FANCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 1Y: 2.26%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 1.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	0.53%	6.70%	4.62%	6.26%	-6.22%	-1.46%	5.16%	6.04%	0.71%	1.89%
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C	0.11%	4.38%	3.74%	3.91%	-4.63%	-1.81%	2.74%	2.90%	0.23%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FJRLX and FANCX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2016	0.77

The correlation between FJRLX and FANCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJRLX vs. FANCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJRLX

FJRLX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FJRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FJRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FJRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FJRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FJRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FANCX

FANCX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FANCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FANCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FANCX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FANCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FANCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJRLX	FANCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.25	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.08	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.28	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	1.93	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	5.72	+2.87

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FANCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJRLX and FANCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJRLX drawdown since its inception was -9.89%, which is greater than FANCX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJRLX and FANCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJRLX	FANCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-7.79%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	-1.18%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.63%	-1.18%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.71%	-7.24%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.46%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-1.54%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	0.40%	+0.03%

Volatility

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) have volatilities of 0.63% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJRLX	FANCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	0.64%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	1.36%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15%	1.81%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.78%	2.14%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.41%	1.77%	+0.64%

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJRLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FANCX's 1.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJRLX vs. FANCX - Dividend Comparison

FJRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than FANCX's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C	3.09%	3.20%	2.95%	1.75%	0.15%	0.36%	1.68%	1.00%	0.69%	0.21%	0.07%	0.00%
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	4.12%	3.93%	3.08%	2.38%	1.26%	1.25%	2.38%	2.44%	2.29%	1.79%	1.88%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJRLX and FANCX in my portfolio?

FJRLX and FANCX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJRLX or FANCX?

FANCX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to FJRLX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJRLX dropped -9.89% vs FANCX's -7.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.