PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJLSX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FJLSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJLSX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 14.25% return.


FJLSX

1D
0.94%
1M
0.14%
6M
6.82%
YTD
10.10%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.57%

FDFPX

1D
1.23%
1M
0.76%
6M
9.74%
YTD
14.25%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FJLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
10.10%18.76%15.81%18.20%-17.92%14.72%17.19%9.22%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
14.25%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FJLSX and FDFPX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.98

The correlation between FJLSX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJLSX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJLSX
FJLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FJLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FJLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FJLSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJLSXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.83

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

11.85

-0.86

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJLSX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJLSX drawdown since its inception was -29.14%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJLSX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJLSXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.14%

-31.22%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-9.54%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-15.42%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-27.41%

+1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.46%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-5.75%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.28%

-0.48%

Volatility

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FJLSX) is 3.38%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FJLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJLSXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.50%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

12.20%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

14.22%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

15.35%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

17.20%

-3.12%

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FJLSX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

FJLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than FDFPX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.74%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%
FJLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
9.79%7.08%8.84%2.51%5.30%6.04%5.68%7.16%8.02%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FJLSX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FJLSX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJLSX dropped -29.14% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJLSX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer