FJLSX vs. FCNTX
FJLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FJLSX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FJLSX returned 8.55%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FJLSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.
Performance
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJLSX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 9.08% return.
FJLSX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund | 10.10% | 18.76% | 15.81% | 18.20% | -17.92% | 14.72% | 17.19% | 25.04% | -7.75% | 9.89% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 9.08% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJLSX and FCNTX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FJLSX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJLSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FJLSX
FCNTX
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FJLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.55 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 6.03 | +4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJLSX drawdown since its inception was -29.14%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJLSX and FCNTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.14% | -49.19% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.40% | -11.30% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | -19.75% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.99% | -32.59% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -2.18% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -8.14% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.91% | -1.11% |
Volatility
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FJLSX) is 3.38%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FJLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 4.63% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 12.38% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 15.43% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 19.40% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 19.75% | -5.67% |
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJLSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FJLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than FCNTX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 4.28% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
FJLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2035 Fund | 9.79% | 7.08% | 8.84% | 2.51% | 5.30% | 6.04% | 5.68% | 7.16% | 8.02% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJLSX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCNTX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FJLSX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJLSX dropped -29.14% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.
FJLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJLSX and FCNTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer