FJAZX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FJAZX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FJAZX returned 2.51%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for FQLSX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FJAZX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQLSX.

Performance

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M (FJAZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAZX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 12.26% return.

FJAZX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 1Y: 8.29%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 2.51%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.30%

FQLSX

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: 8.35%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.67%
• 3Y*: 18.99%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FJAZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJAZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M	3.97%	10.52%	4.50%	9.11%	-14.05%	4.64%	10.18%	13.79%	-5.54%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	12.26%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	16.89%	18.43%	25.96%	-12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAZX and FQLSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.87

The correlation between FJAZX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJAZX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJAZX

FJAZX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FJAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FJAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FJAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FJAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FJAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M (FJAZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJAZX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.62	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.28	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.42	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.39	10.10	-1.71

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAZX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAZX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAZX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJAZX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-31.26%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.07%	-9.48%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.92%	-15.37%	+10.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.07%	-27.41%	+8.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-2.17%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-5.36%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	2.27%	-1.27%

Volatility

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M (FJAZX) is 1.80%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that FJAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJAZX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	4.40%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.85%	12.17%	-7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.54%	14.19%	-8.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.52%	15.36%	-8.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.75%	16.12%	-9.37%

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAZX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJAZX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FJAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FJAZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class M	2.37%	2.48%	2.29%	2.16%	4.52%	5.45%	2.96%	1.92%	1.03%	0.00%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.66%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJAZX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FJAZX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJAZX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FJAZX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAZX dropped -19.07% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.