PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAWX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class I (FJAWX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAWX achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 12.35% return.


FJAWX

1D
0.81%
1M
-0.62%
6M
2.72%
YTD
4.25%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.93%

FWLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.41%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJAWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class I
4.25%11.06%5.02%9.70%-13.63%5.15%10.67%14.37%-4.56%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
12.35%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAWX and FWLSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.87

The correlation between FJAWX and FWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAWX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJAWX
FJAWX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FJAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class I (FJAWX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJAWXFWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.42

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

10.11

-1.06

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAWX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAWX drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, smaller than the maximum FWLSX drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAWX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJAWXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-31.32%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-9.49%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.80%

-15.38%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-27.40%

+8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-2.17%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-5.36%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.27%

-1.29%

Volatility

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class I (FJAWX) is 1.79%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that FJAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJAWXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

4.39%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

12.17%

-7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

14.21%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

15.36%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.72%

16.10%

-9.38%

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAWX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAWX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

FJAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than FWLSX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJAWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class I
2.64%2.89%2.79%2.61%5.02%6.13%3.41%2.35%1.96%0.00%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.08%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FJAWX and FWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FJAWX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAWX dropped -18.64% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAWX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer