PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAQX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class I (FJAQX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAQX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.01% return.


FJAQX

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.77%
6M
3.19%
YTD
4.86%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.73%

DRIQX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.44%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJAQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class I
4.86%12.76%6.04%11.12%-15.07%6.95%11.93%16.57%-5.88%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.01%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAQX and DRIQX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.80

The correlation between FJAQX and DRIQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAQX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJAQX
FJAQX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FJAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class I (FJAQX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJAQXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.90

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

7.47

+1.54

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAQX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAQX drawdown since its inception was -20.76%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIQX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAQX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJAQXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.76%

-19.86%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-3.47%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.75%

-5.12%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-19.86%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.30%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-3.84%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.88%

+0.27%

Volatility

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class I (FJAQX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.10%. This indicates that FJAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJAQXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.10%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

3.60%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

4.52%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.73%

7.07%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

6.58%

+1.62%

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAQX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAQX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

FJAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than DRIQX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.36%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
FJAQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class I
2.55%2.89%2.59%2.61%5.59%6.96%3.98%2.88%1.85%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FJAQX and DRIQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FJAQX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to DRIQX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAQX dropped -20.76% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

FJAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAQX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer