PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAMX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAMX achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return.


FJAMX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.54%
YTD
8.94%
6M
9.66%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJAMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A
8.94%16.59%10.70%14.99%-17.85%10.92%14.85%22.28%-9.49%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAMX and FFGZX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.79

The correlation between FJAMX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAMX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAMX
FJAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FJAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJAMXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.54

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.18

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

14.23

-0.92

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAMX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJAMXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.64

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.93

-0.24

Drawdowns

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAMX drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAMX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJAMXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-14.94%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-3.33%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.16%

-4.76%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-14.94%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-2.26%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.74%

+0.84%

Volatility

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FJAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJAMXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

1.49%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

3.34%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

4.01%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

5.08%

+5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

4.43%

+7.87%

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAMX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

FJAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
FJAMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A
3.34%2.71%3.79%2.11%5.13%6.90%4.47%3.18%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FJAMX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FJAMX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAMX dropped -24.84% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAMX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer