PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAEX vs. FIRQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class C (FJAEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAEX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than FIRQX's 4.06% return.


FJAEX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.16%
YTD
7.76%
6M
8.30%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*

FIRQX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.06%
6M
4.29%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJAEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class C
7.76%14.66%6.87%12.88%-18.09%8.66%13.03%18.83%-8.06%
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
4.06%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.59%12.62%-3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAEX and FIRQX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FJAEX and FIRQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAEX vs. FIRQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAEX
FJAEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FJAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRQX
FIRQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FIRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class C (FJAEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJAEXFIRQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.53

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.72

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.05

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

13.02

-0.49

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FIRQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAEX and FIRQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJAEXFIRQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.53

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAEX drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, smaller than the maximum FIRQX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAEX and FIRQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJAEXFIRQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-38.01%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-3.45%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.13%

-5.19%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-17.04%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-4.44%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.81%

+0.66%

Volatility

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class C (FJAEX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FJAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJAEXFIRQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.67%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

3.43%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

4.16%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.02%

5.57%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.92%

5.33%

+5.59%

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAEX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FIRQX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAEX vs. FIRQX - Dividend Comparison

FJAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than FIRQX's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.11%3.14%2.95%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.50%3.15%5.59%16.31%2.43%4.08%
FJAEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class C
2.40%1.59%1.39%1.56%4.79%5.99%3.53%2.49%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FJAEX and FIRQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FJAEX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FIRQX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAEX dropped -24.67% vs FIRQX's -38.01%.

FIRQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAEX and FIRQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer