PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXT vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXT vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 30.27% return.


FIXT

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.88%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.02%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%

VOLT

1D
1.54%
1M
-3.80%
6M
15.87%
YTD
30.27%
1Y
40.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$753.53K$1.08M$852.15K
$11.23M$11.22M$15.49M

FIXT vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
-0.02%4.57%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
30.27%19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and VOLT is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXT vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXT vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXTVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.34

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

8.84

-6.73

FIXT vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXTVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-23.40%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-17.22%

+14.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-10.39%

+8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-5.35%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

4.55%

-3.34%

Volatility

FIXT vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 1.12%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXTVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

9.72%

-8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

21.11%

-18.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

24.49%

-20.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.76%

25.46%

-21.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.76%

25.46%

-21.70%

FIXT vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIXT and VOLT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FIXT vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than VOLT's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.66%3.24%0.00%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.35%0.46%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIXT and VOLT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOLT has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to FIXT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 40.13% vs 2.57% for FIXT. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 40.13% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIXT and VOLT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

They also come from different issuers: Procure and Tema.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXT and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer