FIXT vs. MVPA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and MVPA (Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FIXT is passively managed, while MVPA is actively managed. Over the past year, FIXT returned 4.69% vs -2.43% for MVPA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MVPA.

Performance

FIXT vs. MVPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than MVPA's -0.96% return.

FIXT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVPA

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: -2.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXT vs. MVPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.71%	4.57%
MVPA Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF	-0.96%	1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and MVPA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.29

FIXT vs. MVPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIXT	MVPA
Healthcare	100.0%	2.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	32.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.0%
Energy	-	11.3%
Financial Services	-	21.7%
Industrials	-	13.9%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Technology	-	5.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. MVPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 36
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MVPA

MVPA Risk / Return Rank: 7
MVPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MVPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MVPA Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MVPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MVPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXT vs. MVPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXT	MVPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	-0.13	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.05	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.99	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	-0.16	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	-0.34	+4.67

FIXT vs. MVPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the MVPA Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and MVPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. MVPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum MVPA drawdown of -25.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and MVPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	MVPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-25.91%	+22.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-15.15%	+12.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-10.87%	+9.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-7.37%	+6.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	7.23%	-6.15%

Volatility

FIXT vs. MVPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 0.91%, while Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	MVPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	4.84%	-3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.48%	14.00%	-11.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	18.64%	-14.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.74%	22.94%	-19.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	22.94%	-19.20%

FIXT vs. MVPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MVPA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. MVPA - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than MVPA's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.52%	3.24%	0.00%
MVPA Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF	0.56%	0.56%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and MVPA in my portfolio?

FIXT and MVPA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIXT or MVPA?

MVPA has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs MVPA's -25.91%.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or MVPA?

On 1-year performance, FIXT leads with 4.69% vs -2.43% for MVPA. On fees, MVPA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIXT or MVPA?

Over the 1-year period, FIXT has performed better with a 4.69% return vs -2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or MVPA?

MVPA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or MVPA?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 0.56% for MVPA.

What is the main difference between FIXT and MVPA?

They also come from different issuers: Procure and Miller. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.60% for MVPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.