FIXT vs. GSWO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FIXT tracks the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index while GSWO tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSWO.

Performance

FIXT vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than GSWO's 11.00% return.

FIXT

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSWO

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 11.00%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXT vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.23%	4.58%
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	11.00%	8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and GSWO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSWO

GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXT vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIXT	GSWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.99	+0.34

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum GSWO drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and GSWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	GSWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-17.77%	+14.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-0.71%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-3.25%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	GSWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	10.75%	-6.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	12.96%	-9.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	12.96%	-9.19%

FIXT vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than GSWO's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.55%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	1.61%	1.74%	1.75%	2.06%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and GSWO in my portfolio?

FIXT and GSWO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or GSWO?

On fees, GSWO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or GSWO?

GSWO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or GSWO?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 1.61% for GSWO.

What is the main difference between FIXT and GSWO?

FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index, while GSWO tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Procure and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.25% for GSWO.