FIXT vs. FYLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FIXT is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, FIXT returned 2.57% vs 37.25% for FYLD. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.

Performance

FIXT vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 21.79% return.

FIXT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: -0.36%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 1Y: 2.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.01%

FYLD

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 5.85%
• 6M: 11.81%
• YTD: 21.79%
• 1Y: 37.25%
• 3Y*: 21.87%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: 11.59%
• ALL TIME*: 8.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	$753.53K	$1.08M	$852.15K
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	$1.76M	$1.82M	$3.05M

FIXT vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	-0.02%	4.57%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	21.79%	15.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and FYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 27
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 95
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXT vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXT	FYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	3.10	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	4.25	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.55	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	6.60	-5.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	20.10	-17.98

FIXT vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and FYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	FYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-44.55%	+41.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-5.67%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-0.66%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-8.74%	+7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	1.86%	-0.65%

Volatility

FIXT vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 1.12%, while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	FYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	2.93%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	9.37%	-6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	12.10%	-8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	16.17%	-12.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	17.75%	-13.99%

FIXT vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than FYLD's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.66%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.31%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and FYLD in my portfolio?

FIXT and FYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIXT or FYLD?

FYLD has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FIXT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or FYLD?

On 1-year performance, FYLD leads with 37.25% vs 2.57% for FIXT. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIXT or FYLD?

Over the 1-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 37.25% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or FYLD?

FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or FYLD?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 3.31% for FYLD.

What is the main difference between FIXT and FYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Procure and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.59% for FYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.