PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXP vs. PSDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXP vs. PSDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than PSDM's 1.23% return.


FIXP

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSDM

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXP vs. PSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIXP and PSDM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.29

The correlation between FIXP and PSDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXP vs. PSDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXP
FIXP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PSDM
PSDM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PSDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXP vs. PSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXPPSDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.64

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.35

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

19.69

-6.46

FIXP vs. PSDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the PSDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXP and PSDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXPPSDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.96

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

2.97

-1.79

Drawdowns

FIXP vs. PSDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXP drawdown since its inception was -3.42%, which is greater than PSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXP and PSDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXPPSDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-1.19%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-1.19%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.16%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.17%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.26%

+0.24%

Volatility

FIXP vs. PSDM - Volatility Comparison

FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) at 0.53%. This indicates that FIXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXPPSDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.53%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

1.28%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

1.75%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.79%

2.01%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

2.01%

+1.78%

FIXP vs. PSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXP has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXP vs. PSDM - Dividend Comparison

FIXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than PSDM's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FIXP
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF
5.39%5.27%0.00%0.00%
PSDM
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF
4.85%4.57%5.17%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIXP and PSDM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIXP has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXP dropped -3.42% vs PSDM's -1.19%.

On 1-year performance, FIXP leads with 6.63% vs 5.16% for PSDM. On fees, PSDM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PSDM has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FIXP has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSDM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for FIXP.

FIXP has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 4.85% for PSDM.

They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for FIXP and 0.40% for PSDM.

PSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXP and PSDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer