FIXP vs. BLUI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FIXP (FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF) and BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, FIXP returned 5.96% vs 7.12% for BLUI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIXP charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLUI.

Performance

FIXP vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXP achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 3.62% return.

FIXP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUI

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 7.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXP vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXP FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF	1.50%	4.86%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	3.62%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXP and BLUI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

FIXP vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXP

FIXP Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BLUI

BLUI Risk / Return Rank: 70
BLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXP vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXP	BLUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.84	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.70	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	2.94	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	12.85	-1.09

FIXP vs. BLUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BLUI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXP and BLUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIXP vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXP drawdown since its inception was -3.42%, which is greater than BLUI's maximum drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXP and BLUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXP	BLUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-2.43%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.14%	-2.43%	+0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.16%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-0.36%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.56%	-0.05%

Volatility

FIXP vs. BLUI - Volatility Comparison

FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) at 1.06%. This indicates that FIXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIXP	BLUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	1.06%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	3.08%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	3.90%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.85%	3.90%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.85%	3.90%	-0.05%

FIXP vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXP has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXP vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

FIXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than BLUI's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	4.70%	2.91%
FIXP FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF	5.38%	5.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXP and BLUI in my portfolio?

FIXP and BLUI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIXP or BLUI?

FIXP has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BLUI (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXP dropped -3.42% vs BLUI's -2.43%.

Which ETF is better, FIXP or BLUI?

On 1-year performance, BLUI leads with 7.12% vs 5.96% for FIXP. On fees, BLUI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BLUI has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIXP or BLUI?

Over the 1-year period, BLUI has performed better with a 7.12% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXP or BLUI?

BLUI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for FIXP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXP or BLUI?

FIXP has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 4.70% for BLUI.

What is the main difference between FIXP and BLUI?

They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for FIXP and 0.75% for BLUI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.