PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXP vs. BLUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXP vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 3.27% return.


FIXP

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLUI

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.02%
YTD
3.27%
6M
3.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXP vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIXP and BLUI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.44

FIXP vs. BLUI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIXP
BLUI

Real Estate

100.0%
51.0%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

46.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Real Estate

FIXP
100.0%
BLUI
51.0%

Communication Services

FIXP
0.0%
BLUI

-

Basic Materials

FIXP

-

BLUI

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIXP

-

BLUI
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FIXP

-

BLUI

-

Energy

FIXP

-

BLUI
46.7%

Financial Services

FIXP

-

BLUI

-

Healthcare

FIXP

-

BLUI

-

Industrials

FIXP

-

BLUI

-

Technology

FIXP

-

BLUI
0.6%

Utilities

FIXP

-

BLUI
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXP vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXP
FIXP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXP vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXPBLUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

FIXP vs. BLUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXPBLUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.97

-0.79

Drawdowns

FIXP vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXP drawdown since its inception was -3.42%, which is greater than BLUI's maximum drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXP and BLUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXPBLUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-2.43%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.43%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.37%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

Volatility

FIXP vs. BLUI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXPBLUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

3.89%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.79%

3.89%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

3.89%

-0.10%

FIXP vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXP has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXP vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

FIXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than BLUI's 4.72% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIXP and BLUI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for FIXP.

FIXP has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 4.72% for BLUI.

They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for FIXP and 0.75% for BLUI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXP and BLUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer