FIXP vs. BESF
FIXP (FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIXP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. FIXP charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
FIXP vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIXP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 19.74% return.
FIXP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIXP vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIXP FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF | 1.33% | 4.97% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.74% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIXP and BESF is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIXP vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
FIXP
BESF
FIXP vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIXP | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIXP | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 2.87 | -1.69 |
Drawdowns
FIXP vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIXP drawdown since its inception was -3.42%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXP and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIXP | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -9.89% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -5.88% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -2.45% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
FIXP vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIXP | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 24.33% | -21.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 24.33% | -20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 24.33% | -20.54% |
FIXP vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIXP has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIXP vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
FIXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than BESF's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.68% | 6.39% |
FIXP FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF | 5.39% | 5.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIXP and BESF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BESF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BESF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for FIXP.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 5.39% for FIXP.
FIXP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for FIXP and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for FIXP and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer