PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXP vs. BESF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXP vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXP achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 17.62% return.


FIXP

1D
0.23%
1M
0.28%
6M
2.11%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.59%

BESF

1D
1.19%
1M
2.81%
6M
7.68%
YTD
17.62%
1Y
58.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
52.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.42K$94.04K$92.36K
$17.88K$15.65K$29.67K

FIXP vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIXP
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF
2.32%5.23%
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
17.62%38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXP and BESF is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXP vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXP
FIXP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BESF
BESF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXP vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXPBESFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

5.06

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.46

11.87

+1.59

FIXP vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXP and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXP vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXP drawdown since its inception was -3.42%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXP and BESF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXPBESFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-10.97%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-10.97%

+8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-7.55%

+7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-3.22%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

4.68%

-4.20%

Volatility

FIXP vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF (FIXP) is 1.37%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that FIXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXPBESFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

7.28%

-5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

15.33%

-12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

25.02%

-21.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

24.31%

-20.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

24.31%

-20.40%

FIXP vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXP has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXP vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

FIXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than BESF's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
5.85%6.39%
FIXP
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Income Premium ETF
5.17%5.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIXP and BESF have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BESF has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to FIXP (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXP dropped -3.42% vs BESF's -10.97%.

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 58.60% vs 6.37% for FIXP. On fees, BESF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FIXP has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 58.60% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BESF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for FIXP.

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 5.17% for FIXP.

FIXP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for FIXP and 0.80% for BESF.

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXP and BESF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer